Sunday, January 29, 2012
Documentary about Spitfire pilots in WWII
For those of you who have read Diana Gabaldon's story, "A Leaf on the Wind of All Hallows", here's a very interesting documentary, 3D Spies of WWII, that aired recently on the PBS series "Nova".
The program goes into great detail about the Spitfire pilots, their role in aerial photo-reconnaissance, how the millions of photos they took were analyzed and interpreted, and how the information contained in those photos helped the Allies defeat the Nazis in WWII. Fascinating stuff!
I think Jerry MacKenzie would be very proud to know that his fellow Spitfire photo-reconnaissance pilots played such an important part in helping to defeat the Nazis. And I'm sure Jerry would have been right there with them, had fate and a stone circle not intervened. <g>
Please note, the video embedded above is just a preview. The full-length video is almost an hour long, but it's well worth watching. Thanks very much to Marte Brengle on Compuserve for the link!
If you haven't yet read "A Leaf on the Wind of All Hallows", I would highly recommend it. There's more information about the story here.
The program goes into great detail about the Spitfire pilots, their role in aerial photo-reconnaissance, how the millions of photos they took were analyzed and interpreted, and how the information contained in those photos helped the Allies defeat the Nazis in WWII. Fascinating stuff!
I think Jerry MacKenzie would be very proud to know that his fellow Spitfire photo-reconnaissance pilots played such an important part in helping to defeat the Nazis. And I'm sure Jerry would have been right there with them, had fate and a stone circle not intervened. <g>
Please note, the video embedded above is just a preview. The full-length video is almost an hour long, but it's well worth watching. Thanks very much to Marte Brengle on Compuserve for the link!
If you haven't yet read "A Leaf on the Wind of All Hallows", I would highly recommend it. There's more information about the story here.
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Diana's public appearances in 2012
Wondering about Diana Gabaldon's schedule of public appearances in 2012? Diana hasn't yet had time to update the Appearances page on her web site, but she posted the following on Compuserve yesterday, and I thought I'd pass it along in case any of you want to start making plans.
Also note Diana's comment about her daughter Jennifer getting married in August in Scotland (and yes, her fiance, Iain, is Scottish!) There's more about that on Compuserve here, if you're interested.
Please pass this information on to anyone else you know who might be interested. Thanks!
Well...very few, to be honest. I'm trying extremely hard to stay home and write. <g> Next thing up is the Vilnius Book Fair, Feb. 23-26th in Lithuania, then the Tucson Book Festival, March 10-11--and a quick appearance at the Arizona Rennaissance Faire on March 17th (that's held in Apache Junction, AZ). And I'm doing a talk (with signing) at a Celtic Tea in Flagstaff, for the Northern Arizona Celtic Heritage Society (I keep trying to get them to change their name from "Society" to "Organization," so I can refer to them as the NACHOs, but so far, they've resisted)--that's March 31st.I'm a little disappointed that she doesn't have a trip to NC planned this year, so it's unlikely I'll get to see her in 2012, but on the other hand:
Might go to New York at the end of April for the Edgar Awards banquet, but there's no public appearance connected with that. _Might_ do ThrillerFest during the summer, but not yet committed--and don't know exactly when it is, for that matter.
Younger Daughter is getting married in August--in Scotland--so there _might_ be something minor in the UK. I know I'm planting a tree given in my honor by the Ladies of Lallybroch, on the grounds of Castle Leod, the Earl of Cromartie having kindly invited me and my husband to stay with him for a couple of days <g>, but no idea when that'll happen.
_Might_ make it to the Historical Novelists Society conference in London at the end of September, but only if I can inveigle my husband into going to Italy for fun <g>, in which case we could stop over in London on the way.
I _will_ be at the Surrey International Writers Conference, in British Columbia, October 19-21. And I think that's about it!
- She wants to stay home as much as possible this year to concentrate on writing WRITTEN IN MY OWN HEART'S BLOOD (aka MOHB, MOBY, or Book 8), and I'm all in favor of that! <g>
- My job as Section Leader of the Diana Gabaldon folder on Compuserve is much easier when Diana is around. So this means less pressure for me on the forum in 2012, and I'm happy about that.
Also note Diana's comment about her daughter Jennifer getting married in August in Scotland (and yes, her fiance, Iain, is Scottish!) There's more about that on Compuserve here, if you're interested.
Please pass this information on to anyone else you know who might be interested. Thanks!
Friday, January 27, 2012
Friday Fun Facts

I've decided to try a new meme: Friday Fun Facts! This will be a selection of odd, unusual, humorous, or otherwise interesting facts that I've learned from reading Diana Gabaldon's books.
1) Jamie measures short distances with the joints of his left middle finger. (SCOTTISH PRISONER, chapter 20, "Stalking Horse", p. 263 in the hardcover)
2) Brianna had a Swiss army knife with her in the 18th century. (ABOSAA chapter 6, "Ambush")
3) Lawrence Stern, the Jewish natural philosopher in VOYAGER, is named after the 18th-century author of TRISTRAM SHANDY, Laurence Sterne.
4) There really was a window tax in Britain in the 18th century. (Roger mentions it in FIERY CROSS, chapter 100, "Dead Whale".)
5) The passenger pigeons are not the only extinct species mentioned in THE FIERY CROSS. Just before Claire's encounter with the immense flock of pigeons, Roger sees some "vivid little parakeets" (beginning of chapter 82, "A Darkening Sky"), which are in fact Carolina parakeets -- also an extinct species in our time.
Thanks to Margaret Campbell on Compuserve, who pointed this out to me several years ago. I didn't actually find the reference until my most recent "re-listen" of FIERY CROSS, just a couple of months ago, but apparently it was Margaret who suggested to Diana that she include the parakeet. Isn't it beautiful? Really a shame that they're gone.
I hope you enjoyed these. I plan to make this a regular blog feature, so please stop by next week for more!
Thursday, January 26, 2012
What really happened to Stonehenge
I love this! It combines two of my favorite addictions: OUTLANDER and Angry Birds. And besides, I just think it's hilarious.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
An app for Robbie Burns Day
Check this out:
http://www.scotland.org/robert-burns-app/
It's available on iTunes as well as the Android Market. (And yes, I did download it. <g>) Thanks to Susan McCreadie (aka @the_bothy on Twitter) for the link!
Happy Burns Day to all of you!
http://www.scotland.org/robert-burns-app/
It's available on iTunes as well as the Android Market. (And yes, I did download it. <g>) Thanks to Susan McCreadie (aka @the_bothy on Twitter) for the link!
Happy Burns Day to all of you!
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
William and time-travel
Can William time-travel?
A lot of people have asked that question since AN ECHO IN THE BONE came out in 2009. It's a question that comes up frequently on Compuserve and on Diana Gabaldon's Facebook page.
[UPDATE 1/24/2012 10:33 am: Please note that Diana has not (to my knowledge) ever come right out and said definitively, "No, William can't time-travel", or "Yes, William has the time-travel gene". Different readers are free to draw their own conclusions. And what I wrote in this blog post is only my own opinion, based on the text and on things Diana has said in public since ECHO came out. If you disagree, that's fine. Only Diana really knows for sure.]
The Evidence
Here's the original scene in ECHO that started all the speculation:
A lot of people seem to think that William "hearing the stones" in the scene in ECHO means he can time-travel.
I understand why people think so. It does seem that Diana deliberately wrote that scene in ECHO in such a way that many readers would be left with that impression. He heard something in the rocks (or thought he did); that much is clear. And was obviously frightened out of his wits as a result. Both of those things could be taken as evidence that he sensed the presence of a time-portal, and therefore, that he can time-travel.
Counter-Argument
Now, I understand the temptation to jump to conclusions here, and assume that because William heard something in the rocks, he must therefore be able to time-travel. But I'm not at all convinced.
1) We know that Jamie does not have the time-travel gene, and it seems awfully unlikely that Geneva Dunsany would have it. Theoretically possible, but very unlikely. (I could be wrong about this, but I don't think I am.)
2) I don't see anything in these two scenes that indicates that there's a stone circle nearby. A pile of "tumbled stones" could be any random rock formation; it certainly doesn't sound like a ring of standing stones marking a time-portal. (And Jamie surely would have noticed a stone circle -- or the remains of one -- on the Helwater estate. Given his reaction when the abbot told him there was a stone circle near Inchcleraun (SCOTTISH PRISONER, p. 257) -- I can't imagine that he would have failed to recognize a circle of stones when he saw it.)
3) William was so young at the time, can his memories of the event really be trusted? Isn't it possible that he was simply hearing the fog-distorted voices of the women (Isobel, Lady Dunsany, and Betty) calling to him, and he only imagined that the voices were coming out of the rocks? That's always been my impression, and seeing the scene from Jamie's point of view in SCOTTISH PRISONER helped to reinforce that.
4) Finally, consider Diana Gabaldon's own comments on this subject. Here's what she said on Facebook today (January 24), in response to a similar question:
Conclusion
I think it's highly unlikely that William has the time-travel gene, and I don't think the incident where he was lost in the fog as a small boy proves that he can travel. But that's just my opinion. Until and unless Diana gives us some definitive proof one way or the other (for example, having the adult William walk up to a ring of standing stones so we can see how he reacts), we just don't know for sure. But it's fine to speculate about it if you want to.
A lot of people have asked that question since AN ECHO IN THE BONE came out in 2009. It's a question that comes up frequently on Compuserve and on Diana Gabaldon's Facebook page.
[UPDATE 1/24/2012 10:33 am: Please note that Diana has not (to my knowledge) ever come right out and said definitively, "No, William can't time-travel", or "Yes, William has the time-travel gene". Different readers are free to draw their own conclusions. And what I wrote in this blog post is only my own opinion, based on the text and on things Diana has said in public since ECHO came out. If you disagree, that's fine. Only Diana really knows for sure.]
The Evidence
Here's the original scene in ECHO that started all the speculation:
He’d heard the rocks talking to themselves on the fells at Helwater. The Lake District, his maternal grandparents’ home. In the fog. He hadn’t told anyone that.And here's the same incident from Jamie's point of view, in THE SCOTTISH PRISONER:
[....]
He’d heard his mother--his real mother--whisper to him, too. That was why he’d gone into the fog. They’d been picnicking on the fells, his grandparents and Mama Isobel and some friends, with a few servants. When the fog came down, sudden as it sometimes did, there was a general scurry to pack up the luncheon things, and he had been left by himself, watching the inexorable white wall roll silently toward him.
And he’d swear he’d heard a woman’s whisper, too low to make out words but holding somehow a sense of longing, and he had known she spoke to him.
And he’d walked into the fog. For a few moments, he was fascinated by the movement of the water vapor near the ground, the way it flickered and shimmered and seemed alive. But then the fog grew thicker, and in moments he’d known he was lost.
He’d called out. First to the woman he thought must be his mother. The dead come down in the fog. That was nearly all he knew about his mother--that she was dead. She’d been no older than he was now when she died. He’d seen three paintings of her. They said he had her hair and her hand with a horse.
She’d answered him, he’d swear she’d answered him--but in a voice with no words. He’d felt the caress of cool fingers on his face, and he’d wandered on, entranced.
Then he fell, badly, tumbling over rocks into a small hollow, bruising himself and knocking out all his wind. The fog had billowed over him, marching past, urgent in its hurry to engulf things, as he lay stunned and breathless in the bottom of his small declivity. Then he began to hear the rocks murmur all around him, and he’d crawled, then run, as fast as he could, screaming. Fell again, got up and went on running.
Fell down, finally unable to go further, and huddled terrified and blind on the rough grass, surrounded by vast emptiness. Then he heard them calling out for him, voices he knew, and he tried to cry out in reply, but his throat was raw from screaming, and he made no more than desperate rasping noises, running toward where he thought the voices were. But sound moves in a fog, and nothing is as it seems: not sound, not time nor place.
Again and again and again, he ran toward the voices but fell over something, tripped and rolled down a slope, stumbled into rocky outcrops, found himself clinging to the edge of a scarp, the voices now behind him, fading into the fog, leaving him.
Mac had found him. A big hand had suddenly reached down and grabbed him, and the next minute he was lifted up, bruised and scraped and bleeding but clutched tight against the Scottish groom’s rough shirt, strong arms holding him as though they’d never let him go.
(From AN ECHO IN THE BONE by Diana Gabaldon, chapter 36 ("The Great Dismal"). Copyright© 2009 by Diana Gabaldon. All rights reserved.)
“William!” he bellowed, plunging into the fog.Argument
“Willie! Willie!” The women’s higher voices obligingly took up the call, regular as a bell on a ship’s buoy, and serving the same purpose. "Willie! Where are youuuu?”
The air had changed quite suddenly, no longer clear but soft and echoing; sound seemed to come from everywhere and nowhere.
“William!” The sound bounced off the stones and the short, leathery turf. "William!”
[....]
He went higher, among the tumbled stones. Staggered from one to another, feeling round their bases, stubbing his toes. The fog was cold in his chest, aching. His foot came down on something soft--Willie’s jacket--and his heart leapt.
“WILLIAM!”
Was that a sound, a whimper? He stopped dead, trying to listen, trying to hear through the whisper of the moving fog and the distant voices, cacophonous as a ring of church bells.
And then, quite suddenly, he saw the boy curled up in a rocky hollow, the yellow of his shirt showing briefly through an eddy in the fog. He lunged and seized William before he could disappear, clutched him to his bosom, saying, “It’s all right, a chuisle, it’s all right now, dinna be troubled, we’ll go and see your grannie, aye?”
“Mac! Mac, Mac! Oh, Mac!”
Willie clung to him like a leech, trying to burrow into his chest, and he wrapped his arms tight around the boy, too overcome to speak.
(From THE SCOTTISH PRISONER by Diana Gabaldon, chapter 39 ("The Fog Comes Down"). Copyright© 2011 by Diana Gabaldon. All rights reserved.)
A lot of people seem to think that William "hearing the stones" in the scene in ECHO means he can time-travel.
I understand why people think so. It does seem that Diana deliberately wrote that scene in ECHO in such a way that many readers would be left with that impression. He heard something in the rocks (or thought he did); that much is clear. And was obviously frightened out of his wits as a result. Both of those things could be taken as evidence that he sensed the presence of a time-portal, and therefore, that he can time-travel.
Counter-Argument
Now, I understand the temptation to jump to conclusions here, and assume that because William heard something in the rocks, he must therefore be able to time-travel. But I'm not at all convinced.
1) We know that Jamie does not have the time-travel gene, and it seems awfully unlikely that Geneva Dunsany would have it. Theoretically possible, but very unlikely. (I could be wrong about this, but I don't think I am.)
2) I don't see anything in these two scenes that indicates that there's a stone circle nearby. A pile of "tumbled stones" could be any random rock formation; it certainly doesn't sound like a ring of standing stones marking a time-portal. (And Jamie surely would have noticed a stone circle -- or the remains of one -- on the Helwater estate. Given his reaction when the abbot told him there was a stone circle near Inchcleraun (SCOTTISH PRISONER, p. 257) -- I can't imagine that he would have failed to recognize a circle of stones when he saw it.)
3) William was so young at the time, can his memories of the event really be trusted? Isn't it possible that he was simply hearing the fog-distorted voices of the women (Isobel, Lady Dunsany, and Betty) calling to him, and he only imagined that the voices were coming out of the rocks? That's always been my impression, and seeing the scene from Jamie's point of view in SCOTTISH PRISONER helped to reinforce that.
4) Finally, consider Diana Gabaldon's own comments on this subject. Here's what she said on Facebook today (January 24), in response to a similar question:
Well, we don't know that he's actually hearing the rocks; he's only three (he thinks he was five at the time, but it was a bit earlier than he recalls) and was lost in the fog and imagining he heard his mother's voice. He may very well have imagined hearing the rocks as well.Diana has also commented on this in a discussion on Compuserve:
I don't _think_ Willie heard the stones scream--he thought they were talking to him.And a bit later in that same thread on Compuserve (here), she mentions "red herrings". I think that's what this is: deliberate misdirection. Or, to put it another way: she's messing with our minds -- something that Diana readily admits that she enjoys doing. She once told me, "Hey, that's one of the chief perks of this job. <g>"
Conclusion
I think it's highly unlikely that William has the time-travel gene, and I don't think the incident where he was lost in the fog as a small boy proves that he can travel. But that's just my opinion. Until and unless Diana gives us some definitive proof one way or the other (for example, having the adult William walk up to a ring of standing stones so we can see how he reacts), we just don't know for sure. But it's fine to speculate about it if you want to.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Happy Chinese New Year!

Happy Chinese New Year! This is the Year of the Dragon, something I couldn't help noticing, being a Dragon myself. <g>
In honor of the day, here's a bit from VOYAGER:
"Bloody man!" I said, exasperation mingled with pity--and a slight feeling of alarm. The ten hours of a Channel crossing were one thing; what would his state be like after two months of this?
"Head of pig," Mr. Willoughby agreed with a lugubrious nod. "He is rat, you think, or maybe dragon?"
"He smells like a whole zoo," I said. "Why dragon, though?"
"One is born in Year of Dragon, Year of Rat, Year of Sheep, Year of Horse," Mr. Willoughby explained. "Being different, each year, different people. You are knowing is Tsei-mi rat, or dragon?"
"You mean which year was he born in?" I had vague memories of the menus in Chinese restaurants, decorated with the animals of the Chinese zodiac, with explanations of the supposed character traits of those born in each year. "It was 1721, but I don't know offhand which animal that was the year of."
"I am thinking rat," said Mr. Willoughby, looking thoughtfully at the tangle of bedclothes, which were heaving in a mildly agitated manner. "Rat very clever, very lucky. But dragon, too, could be. He is most lusty in bed, Tsei-mi? Dragons most passionate people."
(From VOYAGER by Diana Gabaldon, chapter 41 ("We Set Sail"). Copyright© 1997 by Diana Gabaldon. All rights reserved.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






